Miss State
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
88  Rhianwedd Price SR 19:59
180  Shannon Fair SO 20:16
220  Ffion Price SR 20:21
291  Antonia Hehr SO 20:32
302  Stephanie Peterson FR 20:33
438  Mia Meydrich JR 20:49
1,299  Emma Tucker FR 21:50
1,555  Kristy Terp SO 22:06
1,985  Alex Wallace FR 22:32
2,345  Carly Terp SO 22:57
National Rank #29 of 344
South Region Rank #2 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 84.8%
Most Likely Finish 31st at Nationals


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.2%
Top 10 at Nationals 2.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 20.8%


Regional Champion 30.3%
Top 5 in Regional 99.5%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Rhianwedd Price Shannon Fair Ffion Price Antonia Hehr Stephanie Peterson Mia Meydrich Emma Tucker Kristy Terp Alex Wallace Carly Terp
Commadore Classic 09/17 810 20:07 20:24 20:34 20:47 21:14 21:27 22:07 22:10 23:06
Roy Griak Invitational 09/24 561 19:55 20:04 20:07 20:35 20:29 22:06 22:01 22:28
ISU adidas Pre Nationals (Open) 10/15 21:43 22:03 22:55
ISU adidas Pre Nationals (Blue) 10/15 595 19:52 20:11 20:12 20:33 20:34 21:32 22:24
SEC Championship 10/28 689 20:20 20:11 20:39 20:24 20:28 20:56 22:07 21:58 22:33 23:13
South Region Championships 11/11 533 19:50 20:11 20:17 20:17 20:31 20:23 22:07





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 84.8% 24.1 570 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.7 0.5 1.0 1.8 1.4 1.6 2.3 2.6 2.7 2.0 3.2 4.1 3.9 4.8 4.9 4.5 5.8 6.1 7.0 7.4 7.6 8.2
Region Championship 100% 2.1 99 30.3 42.6 18.3 6.1 2.3 0.4 0.1 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Rhianwedd Price 86.9% 82.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.4
Shannon Fair 84.8% 134.2 0.1
Ffion Price 84.8% 151.6
Antonia Hehr 84.8% 181.5
Stephanie Peterson 84.8% 184.2
Mia Meydrich 84.8% 214.7
Emma Tucker 84.8% 250.8


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Rhianwedd Price 6.3 4.1 7.0 9.2 10.1 8.2 8.7 8.2 6.4 6.5 5.7 4.2 3.9 2.7 2.8 2.3 1.7 1.8 1.0 1.2 0.9 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.5
Shannon Fair 14.9 0.3 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.9 3.0 3.2 4.0 3.9 4.5 4.9 5.5 5.3 5.9 5.2 4.6 5.8 3.5 4.4 3.5 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 2.5
Ffion Price 18.4 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.7 0.6 1.6 2.6 3.2 2.4 3.0 3.8 3.8 4.0 3.9 4.9 4.8 4.0 4.4 4.5 4.9 3.7 3.4 3.7 3.2 3.3
Antonia Hehr 26.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.7 1.1 1.1 1.4 1.8 2.1 2.2 2.6 2.6 2.6 3.1 4.0 3.1 4.3 4.2 3.8 3.7
Stephanie Peterson 27.5 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.5 0.9 1.1 1.9 2.0 2.3 1.8 2.5 2.6 3.3 3.0 3.4 3.7 3.9 2.7 3.5
Mia Meydrich 40.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 1.1 0.8 1.1 1.2 1.7 1.6
Emma Tucker 112.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 30.3% 100.0% 30.3 30.3 1
2 42.6% 100.0% 42.6 42.6 2
3 18.3% 53.8% 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.6 0.7 1.4 1.2 1.3 0.6 1.4 8.5 9.9 3
4 6.1% 33.1% 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 4.1 2.0 4
5 2.3% 2.2% 0.1 2.2 0.1 5
6 0.4% 0.4 6
7 7
8 0.1% 0.1 8
9 0.1% 0.1 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 84.8% 30.3 42.6 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.5 1.4 1.5 0.8 1.8 15.3 72.9 11.9




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Minnesota 31.9% 1.0 0.3
Florida 27.8% 2.0 0.6
Furman 25.1% 2.0 0.5
Virginia 24.8% 1.0 0.2
Missouri 24.4% 1.0 0.2
Eastern Kentucky 12.1% 2.0 0.2
Kentucky 11.3% 1.0 0.1
Louisville 9.3% 2.0 0.2
Air Force 8.9% 1.0 0.1
Alabama 7.3% 1.0 0.1
Vanderbilt 6.1% 1.0 0.1
Rice 5.9% 1.0 0.1
Kansas 5.6% 1.0 0.1
Ohio State 3.8% 2.0 0.1
Duke 3.2% 1.0 0.0
Colorado St. 2.1% 2.0 0.0
Butler 1.7% 1.0 0.0
Oklahoma 1.0% 2.0 0.0
Dartmouth 0.8% 1.0 0.0
Brown 0.6% 1.0 0.0
Auburn 0.3% 2.0 0.0
Indiana 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Elon 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Georgia 0.1% 2.0 0.0
Clemson 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Northern Illinois 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Cal Poly 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Wyoming 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Northern Arizona 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Purdue 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 3.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 9.0